Abstract
Effects of blood flow restriction training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on rehabilitation outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  
DOI:10.3870/zgkf.2026.09.005
EN KeyWords: blood flow restriction training  neuromuscular electrical stimulation  anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Fund Project:浙江康复医疗中心院级科研课题(ZKYB2503)
作者单位
章怡沁 1.浙江康复医疗中心(浙江中医药大学附属康复医院),杭州310052 
林甲纯 2.杭州博养医院 
李凯洋 1.浙江康复医疗中心(浙江中医药大学附属康复医院),杭州310052 
莫亚峰 1.浙江康复医疗中心(浙江中医药大学附属康复医院),杭州310052 
胡志豪 1.浙江康复医疗中心(浙江中医药大学附属康复医院),杭州310052 
秦郑圆 1.浙江康复医疗中心(浙江中医药大学附属康复医院),杭州310052 
金以翔 1.浙江康复医疗中心(浙江中医药大学附属康复医院),杭州310052 
View Counts: 212
PDF Download Counts: 93
EN Abstract:
  Objective: To evaluate the rehabilitation efficacy of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A total of 66 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a random number table, with 33 cases in each group. In addition to conventional rehabilitation exercises, the control group received NMES therapy, while the experimental group received NMES combined with BFRT. The therapeutic outcomes were assessed before treatment and at 8th week post-treatment using the Lysholm score, joint position reproduction error, passive movement detection threshold, the tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and thigh circumference difference. Adverse events were also recorded. Results: After 8 weeks of intervention, both groups showed significant improvement in Lysholm scores compared with baseline (P<0.05), with the experimental group demonstrating significantly greater improvement than the control group (P<0.05). The joint position reproduction error, passive movement detection threshold, and TSK-11 scores were significantly reduced in both groups compared with baseline (P<0.05), with the experimental group showing a more pronounced reduction than the control group (P<0.05). Although the thigh circumference difference decreased in both groups, no statistically significant difference was observed between them. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the groups. Conclusion: The combination of BFRT and NMES in postoperative rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction significantly enhances knee function recovery, improves proprioception, and effectively alleviates kinesiophobia, with good safety profile, making it worthy of further clinical application in rehabilitation studies.
查看全文   Download PDF Reader  HTML Full Text
Close
WeChat QR code